All of our mandamus actions have moved very fast: it took an average of about 70 days from the date of filing to have our immigration applications adjudicated. The only exception is our mandamus action to compel the CIS to conduct interview in a N-400 application. This case was filed on January 5, 2008 and is set for government's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction on April 25, 2008. 1447b cases(for N-400 applicants interviewed but did not receive a decision within 120 days after the interview), the average time is much shorter: about 60 days.
We just had all serious criminal charges against our client dropped yesterday in state court. Our client is charged with pimping, among other things. If convicted, he will be deported after serving time in state prison. The District Attorneys Office realized, after our maneuver, they did not have a solid case against our client and they dismissed all charges, with prejudice, at yesterday's hearing.
Ms. T, after spending 8 years fighting deportation, was finally granted relief by immigration judge last week. Ms. T was previously represented by two other attorneys, each one ruined her case. We started representing her after the judge ordered her deportation. The motion to BIA was granted and the case was remanded for new hearing. Because damaged caused by previous attorney, we have had difficult time conducting new hearing. The judge was very suspicious of Ms. T testimony because of the contradictions embodied in her previous testimony and her current one. Nonetheless we managed to overcome these difficulties and successfully convinced the judge that she deserves a relief.
Another client who had an abortion in her home country and is now pregnant for her second baby. The Asylum Office approved her application for asylum mainly based on her current pregnancy.
Showing posts with label california mandamus attorney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label california mandamus attorney. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Friday, January 25, 2008
two Motions for Summery Judgment filed in Mandamus cases
We have just filed two motions for summery judgment in two mandamus action cases where plaintiffs have been waiting for more than 2 years in their I-485 application. We will post the result in the future.
Motion No. One(on 1/29/2008, CIS approved this case: updated 1/30/2008)
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.
U.S. District Court
Northern District of California
Notice of Electronic Filing or Other Case Activity
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: Please read this entire notice before calling the Help Desk. If you have questions, please email the Help Desk by replying to this message; include your question or comment along with the original text.
Please note that these Notices are sent for all cases in the system when any case activity occurs, regardless of whether the case is designated for e-filing or not, or whether the activity is the filing of an electronic document or not.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If there are two hyperlinks below, the first will lead to the docket and the second will lead to an e-filed document.
If there is no second hyperlink, there is no electronic document available .
See the FAQ posting 'I have a Notice of Electronic Filing that was e-mailed to me but there's no hyperlink...' on the ECF home page at https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov for more information.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following transaction was received from by Wang, Justin entered on 1/2008 12:51 PM PST and filed on 1/2008
Case Name: xxx v. Chertoff et al
Case Number: 5:07-cv-xxxx
Filer: xxx xx xxx
Document Number: 4
Docket Text:
MOTION for Summary Judgment and Notice of Motion filed by xxx xxx xxx. (Wang, Justin) (Filed on 1/25/2008)
5:07-cv-xxxx Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Justin X. Wang justin@lawbw.com,
5:07-cv-xxxx Notice has been delivered by other means to:
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document description:Main Document
Original filename:F:\Mandamus\485\C07-xxxx JW--Motion for Summary Judgment.pdf
Electronic document Stamp:
[STAMP CANDStamp_ID=97733 [Date=1/25/2008] [FileNumber=40835xx-0]
[740d74840870d1ab3c935afe0a5ed2f44be0047c6f4183ff9ff64a38d64ca463a
dbc9675c9d1b0bf88a88f09a69734757fe1e61c7f51c2a3ec6c28]]
Motion No. Two
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.
U.S. District Court
Northern District of California
Notice of Electronic Filing or Other Case Activity
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: Please read this entire notice before calling the Help Desk. If you have questions, please email the Help Desk by replying to this message; include your question or comment along with the original text.
Please note that these Notices are sent for all cases in the system when any case activity occurs, regardless of whether the case is designated for e-filing or not, or whether the activity is the filing of an electronic document or not.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If there are two hyperlinks below, the first will lead to the docket and the second will lead to an e-filed document.
If there is no second hyperlink, there is no electronic document available .
See the FAQ posting 'I have a Notice of Electronic Filing that was e-mailed to me but there's no hyperlink...' on the ECF home page at https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov for more information.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following transaction was received from by Wang, Justin entered on 1/24/2008 5:41 PM PST and filed on 1/24/2008
Case Name: Tang v. Chertoff et al
Case Number: 5:07-cv-6089
Filer: Heng Tang
Document Number: 4
Docket Text:
MOTION for Summary Judgment and Notice of Motion filed by Heng Tang. Motion Hearing set for 3/18/2008 10:00 AM in Courtroom #5, 4th Floor, San Jose. (Wang, Justin) (Filed on 1/24/2008)
5:07-cv-6089 Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Justin X. Wang justin@lawbw.com, 5:07-cv-6089 Notice has been delivered by other means to:
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Motion No. One(on 1/29/2008, CIS approved this case: updated 1/30/2008)
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.
U.S. District Court
Northern District of California
Notice of Electronic Filing or Other Case Activity
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: Please read this entire notice before calling the Help Desk. If you have questions, please email the Help Desk by replying to this message; include your question or comment along with the original text.
Please note that these Notices are sent for all cases in the system when any case activity occurs, regardless of whether the case is designated for e-filing or not, or whether the activity is the filing of an electronic document or not.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If there are two hyperlinks below, the first will lead to the docket and the second will lead to an e-filed document.
If there is no second hyperlink, there is no electronic document available .
See the FAQ posting 'I have a Notice of Electronic Filing that was e-mailed to me but there's no hyperlink...' on the ECF home page at https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov for more information.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following transaction was received from by Wang, Justin entered on 1/2008 12:51 PM PST and filed on 1/2008
Case Name: xxx v. Chertoff et al
Case Number: 5:07-cv-xxxx
Filer: xxx xx xxx
Document Number: 4
Docket Text:
MOTION for Summary Judgment and Notice of Motion filed by xxx xxx xxx. (Wang, Justin) (Filed on 1/25/2008)
5:07-cv-xxxx Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Justin X. Wang justin@lawbw.com,
5:07-cv-xxxx Notice has been delivered by other means to:
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document description:Main Document
Original filename:F:\Mandamus\485\C07-xxxx JW--Motion for Summary Judgment.pdf
Electronic document Stamp:
[STAMP CANDStamp_ID=97733 [Date=1/25/2008] [FileNumber=40835xx-0]
[740d74840870d1ab3c935afe0a5ed2f44be0047c6f4183ff9ff64a38d64ca463a
dbc9675c9d1b0bf88a88f09a69734757fe1e61c7f51c2a3ec6c28]]
Motion No. Two
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.
U.S. District Court
Northern District of California
Notice of Electronic Filing or Other Case Activity
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: Please read this entire notice before calling the Help Desk. If you have questions, please email the Help Desk by replying to this message; include your question or comment along with the original text.
Please note that these Notices are sent for all cases in the system when any case activity occurs, regardless of whether the case is designated for e-filing or not, or whether the activity is the filing of an electronic document or not.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If there are two hyperlinks below, the first will lead to the docket and the second will lead to an e-filed document.
If there is no second hyperlink, there is no electronic document available .
See the FAQ posting 'I have a Notice of Electronic Filing that was e-mailed to me but there's no hyperlink...' on the ECF home page at https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov for more information.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following transaction was received from by Wang, Justin entered on 1/24/2008 5:41 PM PST and filed on 1/24/2008
Case Name: Tang v. Chertoff et al
Case Number: 5:07-cv-6089
Filer: Heng Tang
Document Number: 4
Docket Text:
MOTION for Summary Judgment and Notice of Motion filed by Heng Tang. Motion Hearing set for 3/18/2008 10:00 AM in Courtroom #5, 4th Floor, San Jose. (Wang, Justin) (Filed on 1/24/2008)
5:07-cv-6089 Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Justin X. Wang justin@lawbw.com, 5:07-cv-6089 Notice has been delivered by other means to:
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)